Today, scholars of federal Indian law regard the propriety of different legal instruments establishing reservations to be a vestigial question. We are used to a federal Indian law where we may safely ...

Montana v. US is a case about tribal civil jurisdiction. Yet it has had a second life in a surprising context: federal statutes of general applicability that do not mention tribes. This Comment ...

In this response, I suggest that while Khan and her co-authors are on the right track, even their ambitious vision may not be ambitious enough. The problem with the notice and consent paradigm isn’t ...

Aditya Bamzai and Peter Shane trace the enduring debate of the President’s removal power. Together they provide a comprehensive yet succinct history ...

Sonia Mittal–a senior January 6 prosecutor–details the firings, demotions, and investigations of DOJ prosecutors. Mittal argues these executive ac ...

Within the context of government grants to private entities conditioned on restrictions of speech, scholars and courts have been grasping for something like an extension of Dole’s independent ...

Drawing on global political histories, Diego Zambrano explores why many democracies abroad rally around “the rule of law,” while Americans reach i ...

In Trump’s second term, courts face mounting pressure to issue broad, sweeping remedies in response to clear executive overreach. While Samuel Bray and James Pfander often disagree about judicial ...

EO 14230 is not merely bureaucratic overreach; it is, as Judge Howell suggested during the initial hearing, a directive that “puts the cart before the horse” and mirrors “what happened during the Red ...

Volume 78 July 2025 Symposium – Executive Overreach and the Rule of Law in Trump II Trumpian Impoundments in Historical Perspective Zachary S. Price * ...

A Note for Readers: Adversarial collaborations are written by scholars who hold opposing views on their topic—together, they write one Essay to clarify points of agreement, precisely identify areas of ...